10 August, 2006

Censorship of Arab viewpoint on Indian TVs

Sridala has tipped this piece to me. She was tipped by Anand of Vikalp group. I am really wondering where are we heading in terms of our foreign policy. At present I think it is neither principle based nor issue based. It is perhaps kowtowing to the US and its cronies only.

India Bans Arab TV Channels Under Pressure From Israel

Shahid Raza Burney, Arab News

BOMBAY, 6 August 2006 - In a country widely referred to as the world's largest democracy, the Indian government has succumbed to mounting Israeli pressure and ordered a nationwide ban on the broadcast of Arab television channels.

The Indian government's ban on Arab television stations is in complete contrast to the friendship that Arab countries imagine exists with their neighbor across the Arabian Sea. It seems the ban is a move to ensure that Indians do not get to see the atrocities that are presently being committed by Israel in Lebanon and the occupied territories.

Nabila Al-Bassam, a Saudi businesswoman on a trip to Bombay, told Arab News how she became exasperated at not being able to watch Arab channels at Bombay's leading five-star Oberoi Hotel. When she took up the issue with the hotel manager, she was told that Arab television channels had been banned across India.

A perplexed Al-Bassam then sent an SMS to Arab News Editor in Chief Khaled Almaeena to verify whether this was indeed the case. "Oberoi Hotel tells me that the government of India has banned all Arab TV channels. Why? I hate watching CNN and BBC," she wrote to Almaeena.

Talking to Arab News, Oberoi Hotel Manager Mohit Nirula did allude to the fact that a ban was in place. "The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has laid down certain rules. It is our duty to abide by and follow the rules of the country," he told this correspondent.

Minister of Information and Broadcasting Priya Ranjan Dasmunshi was busy in Parliament and was unavailable for comment on the issue. However, a ministry official explained why the Indian government decided to enforce the ban. The official highlighted that India enjoys close and cordial relations with Israel and the US more than any of the Arab governments.

According to another source within the government, the ban is a clear sign to all governments in the Middle East that the Israeli, American and British governments carry far more influence in India than any of the Arab governments.

Several senior Indian journalists explained that the ban was an indication that India had succumbed to Israeli pressure rather than American.

"The whole exercise is to browbeat Arabs and show them as terrorists. The government is subscribing to the absurd argument that channels like Al- Jazeera and Al-Arabiya promote hatred and encourage terrorism," they said.

Political analysts in India described the move as a game of double standard that India is playing. On the one hand India establishes friendship with the Arab world while simultaneously it joins with Israel and the US in defaming them. It seems that the pro-Israeli lobby wishes to drive a wedge between India and its time-tested Arab allies. The Indian government's present stance is in stark contrast to the late Mrs. Indira Gandhi's staunch support of the Palestinian cause.

The banning of Arabic channels is a federal government decision, done under what senior Indian journalists claim to be intense pressure from the Israeli, American and British governments.

The Indian government has been vocal in its condemnation of Israeli barbarity and has offered millions of rupees in aid to refugees in Lebanon. Arabs sympathetic to India have therefore met the news with surprise.

Many Arabs draw inspiration from India's heroic struggle against British imperialism and the Indian independence struggle is seen by Palestinians as a brilliant example of throwing out the yoke of imperialism. It is sad that 50 years after independence the world's largest democracy unfairly suppresses alternative opinion and allows itself to be dictated to by foreign powers.

The analysts believe the Indian government may have used a clause within the Cable TV Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, that certain channels or programs that can potentially cause damage to India's friendly relations with foreign countries can be banned, a clear violation of democratic ideals such as freedom of _expression and freedom of speech.

The response to the ban by hotel administrations across Bombay has been dismal. Chad Alberico, JW Marriott's customer care official in Washington, said: "We have reviewed your recent inquiries regarding the television offerings at our JW Marriott Bombay. We have phoned our colleagues at the hotel to discuss the matter at hand, but as it is the weekend, we will need additional time to form a complete response."

"I'm on my way home, it's the weekend and I will respond on Monday," said Shehnaz Ankelsaria from the Taj President Hotel. Annan Udeshi from The Hilton was unavailable and asked for a message to be left on her recorder. Khushnooma Kapadia of Marriott Hotel said she would get back later. Rafat Kazi from the Grand Central Sheraton said that she would answer after consulting her general manager. Puja Guleria of Sheraton Maratta said she needed time to deal with the questions. Firuza Mistry of Grand Hyatt said that she was not aware of the facts and would check and respond, and Priya Mathias of Hyatt Regency said that she would also need to check with her senior officials to comment.

5 Comments:

Blogger Space Bar said...

I ought to clarify that 'Anand' from Vikalp is Anand Patwardhan. He posted this to the Vikalp: Films For Freedom list and this has been sent on to Dan and this blog.

10/8/06 16:25  
Blogger Dan Husain said...

Oh Anand Patwardhan. I remember him. He had come to watch Dastangoi at Prithvi. Though he liked it, we only exchanged pleasantries. Thank you for this Sridala. :-)

Best regards

11/8/06 02:05  
Blogger Enemy of the Republic said...

In America, the news doesn't even consider the Arab point of view. This war is seen as yet another struggle of right against might--I really need to blog about this. But suffice to say, if one watches the news or reads the mainstream press, he/she has to be adept at reading between the lines, because for some reason, over 600 casualties in one invaded country versus 40 or so does not seem shockingly out of proportion. The fact that a third of the Lebonese casualties are children seems to be even less significant. It just must stink to the nostrils of God. But perhaps I am overreacting and everyone else around me sees something I don't.

13/8/06 06:24  
Blogger Space Bar said...

i'd say it's not just america; have you noticed how little difference there is in everyone's reportage of events? it appears to generate a kind of consensus when there really is none.

13/8/06 10:28  
Blogger Enemy of the Republic said...

I did some reading tonight, and I think the world is amazed that Israel, who has affirmed their capablilities for this, has not razed Lebanon to the ground and made it uninhabitable for centuries. They are more amazed that the Shites, who were seen as worse than the Jews at one time by the Sunnis, are so well-trained and organized. Some of this is from Iran--indeed, a good part, but money comes from other wealthy Shite sources, including the US, which is seeking out terrorists cells for this possible likelyhood. Your point is well-taken; how can one form a consensus when bald facts are hidden and disguised; things are not as they seem. When this war began, I said to my husband: this will be a long one. He agreed, but few others did, because everyone thought that Israel had the military superiority, plus the backing of the US. Yet they have been proven vulnerable, not incapable of losing, but perhaps not able to acheive the victories that happened in the past. In short, the Arab world is pissed off and no one with any real authority is doing much to make things better for them--thus the violence may quadruple, not just in Lebanon, but in other countries where more innocent victims will be affected for no reason. This may sound bad coming from an American, but I wish we could keep our nose out of it and let Europe and Asia engineer the peace process. We are way too resented, and the Iraqi War does not give us an ounce of moral authority.

13/8/06 11:15  

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated. Please be patient - an admin will be along soon to check on the pending list.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home